November 11th, 2011

Alex Gerrard: That Was Fast

Nine days. That’s the time it took Alex Gerrard to recoup from the birth of¬†her third child before¬†hitting up Cricket in Liverpool.

New world record?

Related Posts with Thumbnails

38 Responses to “Alex Gerrard: That Was Fast”

  1. karina says:

    talk about gold digger…

  2. Mari says:

    …but wrong outfit!!!!

  3. 1234 says:

    Maybe she bought something for the baby? Maybe it was too cold so she decided to leave the baby home?

  4. [...] View the original article here [...]

  5. Jen says:

    Congrats on the birth, and wow on getting back to a fairly normal size in that amount of time. Again I have to comment on her choice of clothes, ok just her shoes this time. What is up with them?? I can accept that she needed a little time to herself, she deserves it, although she shouldn't spend ALL of Stevie's money.

  6. Eleanor says:

    So what does the law state about shopping after giving birth? How many days/months/years are you supposed to wait before you can take a few hours out to have some time to yourself?

  7. Seriously? says:

    i don’t quite understand the whole “we never see her spending time with her kids thing”….why would any one of us?! Obviously none of us is with her every single second of everyday and if she took a couple of hours out of her day to do a little shopping, she’s entitled to do so. she’s hardly neglected her children has she? this is one moment in an entire day, not 24 hours so i think everyone just needs to calm down. and if she feels good enough 9 days after giving birth to go shopping, that’s her business. There are plenty of housewives out there who do the same thing she does but the only reason it’s a problem here is because she’s a WAG. talk about double standards….

  8. Melanieee. says:

    well at least abby took her newborn with her.
    at least thats a tad better then leaving your child at home while you go on a shopping spree.

    • jujuejur says:

      You're comment made me laugh because I was reading that article about abbey taking her new born out and the best rated coments were
      "she looks great but why would you take a 10 day old baby to Zara? do you really need to go shopping right now..?"
      "I'm no expert on babies, but I just can't see taking a 10 day old newborn out on a shopping trip"

    • Kristina says:

      I salute her for not taking the kid out so soon. There are a lot of germs out there, especially the RS virus can make small children seriously ill. In Sweden parents are recommended to not take their infants out in crowded places at this time of year. Of course they should go outdoors but not in shopping malls and the like. If you want to think happy thoughts instead just picture Stevie cuddling at home with his kids while mommy enjoys a well deserved break.

  9. hmm says:

    All this woman does is spend her husband's money on shopping. For a mother of 3, rarely we see her spend her time with her children. A WAG to the core.

  10. Marina_Isabella says: these chicks seem to be wired for that…

  11. Eva says:

    I don't understand how this is praise worthy? She had a child and nine days later she's at the mall shopping. So having a new life born didn't change her perspective on life or what really is important, like, um idk, your newborns?
    Maybe I'm over-analyzing it but i guess if she was vain and consumerist and shallow before pregnancy and if her pregnancy and motherhood still didn't change that then there's no hope for her of ever being more than a WAG. how sad.

    • tough crowd! says:


    • Esquisse says:

      So u think, that she should be at home with baby lke.. ALL THE TIME?
      She can't even go out?

    • Kristina says:

      OMG. I wonder how you're comment can be praise worthy? I wrote a comment further down before I read yours that could serve as a respond to yours as well. I don't get how you could NOT feel happy for someone who obviously has had an easy birth? I have seen a "victim" of the opposite close up and believe me, I would have preferred this. Why do you have to put moral values into this? She clearly is healthy, and her kid is healthy. That's all that matters. If she feel the need to break out for a while and do stuff that she did before motherhood, and is able too do it, then I think she and her family benefits from it. If she would have preferred to stay indoors, or have felt to tired to go out, I would say nothing about it either.

      • Kristina says:

        Sooo, you are thumbing me down for wishing a mother and her kids healthy and happy lives? ok.

      • tough crowd! says:

        Kristin, Why are you suprise that her comments are praise worthy? This is Kickette. come did you forget?

  12. Mihn says:

    Where is her baby?

    • Esquisse says:

      I guess if she had taken Lourdes with her there would have appeared comments like "she's too small to be taken out" or "how can she carry baby in those heels" (as happened with Victoria Beckham).

      • tough crowd! says:

        Exactly, No mather what people will always over-analyze, over judge, and over- analyze over juge more!

  13. robina says:

    hmmm methinks a little tummy tuck went with that baby birthing.

  14. kix says:

    still a carb/butter face.

  15. kel says:

    She doesn't look especially thin to me. I can beleive she had a baby that recently, especially with a loose top on

    • Kristina says:

      It's not the weight thing, hun. It's the being out-and-about 9 days after squeezing a third baby out of her privates. That's not bad. Not bad at all.

      • kel says:

        I find it a bit sad actually that she would feel the need to make herself go out 9 days after pushing a baby out of her privates (or getting a c-section) just to "keep up appearences" or whatever. This is her third kid though. She should be pretty much an expert on how to handle post-pregnancy

        • Kristina says:

          I'm not saying it as if it was a contest. I wouldn't hold it against her if she would lie in bed totally exhausted, not at all. I'm definitely not putting any moral value into this. I'm just figuring that the delivery must have been a less harsh one for her to look so good, and I'm happy for her. I have seen my sister after loosing a lot of blood after some nightmarish births, and let me tell you I would have preferred it if she looked like Alex. Anyway, at the end of the day, all that matters is healthy mothers and kids.

  16. Thea says:

    That's super human – and really amazing! You go girl!!!!

    • elsebethynwa says:

      super human? She just needs to spend the money she made on selling the pics to Hallo Magazine. besides, don't you think she has a nanny sitting at home with the baby? Or you think Stevie is doing it for her?

      • Eleanor says:

        "Or do you think Stevie is doing it for her?"
        So only women are supposed to spend time with their children? What is this, 1940?
        You make having a child sound like a chore that she can't be bothered with.

        • elsebethynwa says:

          well having a kid is the best way for a wag to be set for life, so in a way you can see it as a chore. I'm sure Stevie G is a lovely father. He's a great person, and I would love for him to have a wife who isn't just an airhead bimbo. But that's who he wants and I guess we all have to accept that.

          • Eleanor says:

            Fair enough then. She's an airhead bimbo who sees her children as nothing but a chore. What a horrible woman!

            To be honest though you just sound bitter. Has she got the man you want? :(

      • Kristina says:

        Name one reason why Stevie shouldn't be at home bonding with his 9 days old kid? Name one reason why it is wrong for Alex to go out shopping? Bimbo you call her. Well now she has three (3) kids with Stevie. Either she is not a bimbo, but a person worth having three kids with, or Stevie is just as much of a bimbo as she is.

  17. HoneyBee says:

    9 days???RESPECT.And her body looks fantastic-one more reason to dislike her.LOLBut what's with her toes out in November.

  18. Hot4Spurs says:

    She just had to compete with Abbey Clancy didn't she? LOL!