January 23rd, 2012

Irina Shayk: Fingerless Gloves Are Good For Something

Images: Replay Jeans.

We’ve been slow to post on the pics doing the rounds of Irina Shayk’s Autumn/Winter campaign for Replay Jeans. Reason being we’re conflicted.

Yes, Irina’s topless. We can obviously see that. But she’s also wearing fingerless gloves in various colours and textures.

We normally understand these fash-hazards to have no real purpose other than to protect the palms of wannabes falling down nightclub stairs, but once again, we’ve been shown that we don’t know squat about anything. We think we do, but we do not.

As Cristiano’s girlfriend skillfully demonstrates, fingerless gloves are great breast warmers. In the off chance that one’s shirt, scarf or jacket are nowhere to be found, of course.

Kickettes, should we employ these uniquely versatile accessories for our next Friday night outing, or fight them until we break a pinky nail? Please do advise.

Related Posts with Thumbnails

38 Responses to “Irina Shayk: Fingerless Gloves Are Good For Something”

  1. sohbet says:

    very blog thanks admin

  2. Uggs outlet says:

    versatility and defense against the sun and rain.

  3. misshelenasofia says:

    Those elegant fingerless gloves are to accessorize a pair of naked hands that will in turn cover the naked bosom of this exquisite high profile model [/sarc....]

  4. wenty says:

    shes pretty but I still dont like her and her Bf

  5. GermaninLondon says:

    An underwhelming, over-rated, hypocritical, Mick-Jagger-lips with unfinished gloves!

  6. Agnes Wonka says:

    It's not the same Playboy (a mag for horny men) than a sexy ad.

    • footballandme says:

      A mag for horny men? Havent you ever seen the inside of Esquire magazine? Hardly a read to do with some knitting!

  7. xoWinnie says:

    photo with the hawt dude…PAUSE! way too much photoshop. looks super awkward :/
    otherwise, she's werkin it! get that money gurl!

  8. coco says:

    The problem I have with her is how she says she won't pose nude and then she does. She turns down playboy but is nude in most of the pics taken. Tries to sue GQ for "photo shopping her panties off" even though there was a behind the scenes video being taken showing that she was nude. It's not a big deal that she's nude, a lot of photo shoots are done like that and that is what models do but don't try and act like you are better or classier than someone while you are doing the same thing. It makes you look like a liar and a fake!!

  9. Maran says:

    I think she's beautiful.

  10. Inveja_Mata says:

    Want me to put a link for a playboy shoot for you to see the difference?

    • Donna C says:

      Okay Irina's best friend why don't you check out the other link I posted first? I didn't know posing with your vagina out was considered classy and if you'r gunna try and defend her don't because I can find several racier shots than these posted on here. Last time I checked I don't see highly respected models posing in a trashy manner.

  11. FootyFanUSA says:

    Kickette.I think you are missing the focal point of this photo shoot. The guy with the tattoos is

  12. Hot4Spurs says:

    She's still growing on me, but I'm not a huge fan of these pics.

    • Inveja_Mata says:

      I agree. I think it's a pretty boring photoshoot tbh even if the guy is supposed to be a great photographer? But a girl has to pay the bills and she must get a good money from Replay.

  13. littlegreenpea says:

    Her LIPS. Are so BIG. They take up hlf of her face! Sorry, but that's what I think.

  14. LexInChitown says:

    Yeah…..still don't think she's pretty.

  15. Agnes Wonka says:

    She looks hot! I'd kill to have her body…and her boyfriend.

  16. LizzyHS90 says:

    No fingerless gloves. No Irina. That is the way to go.

  17. lady says:

    yeah, yeah, great. but who is the guy with her!?! why has no one asked that yet.

  18. Sergz says:

    I'm about to offend someone, i'm sure, but WHY hire a model with no ass whatsoever to promote jeans?

    • Catie2838 says:

      Because then they'd have to actually make jeans to fit a girl with an ass.

    • iram1982 says:

      u really dont think she has a booty??

    • mata says:

      Because they are trying to make the picture appealing to women, so that women will look at her and think "I want to look like that" and buy the jeans, and most woman (and a lot of guys) seem to think a small bottom is best. All we of the ample curves can say is thank god for Latin men!!

    • Agnes Wonka says:

      She has a great bottom! The problem is that the media makes people consider that a "good" bottom has to be a Kardashian-like one, and it doesn't have to be like that precisely.

      • xoWinnie says:

        Kim's butt grosses me out. it looks so exaggerated and unnatural!
        but what pisses me off the most is that the broad insists it's real -_-

  19. lexie says:

    don't like 'em…
    there's something wrong with her face in these pics, she has a wonderful body though. (b*tch!!)

  20. Nae says:

    The lady that DOESNT pose semi or naked ladies and gentlemen… Miss Irina Shayk.

    • kel says:

      I'm not sure I've ever seen a picture of her where there's no nudity or selling sex. She's barely any different to a glamour model.

      • mata says:

        Well, she's really quite small breasted, unlike the glamour models, and she does from time to time pose to sell a product as opposed to just a sexy image, but I agree she certainly is not a "real" model like Gisele or Daria.

        • kel says:

          If they were bigger, she'd be more in the glamour line of things imo. Even when she's selling a product there's some kind of sex attached to it. Case in point, she's selling jeans in these pics but she's topless and doing all the "sexy" expressions

      • xoWinnie says:

        she's the smaller-breasted "classier" version of a glamour girl.
        they're called lingerie/swimsuit models.

  21. Chavete says:

    Topless for Replay again? must have sold a lot jeans thanks to the last ad with her.

  22. AC_USA says:

    Cover up boobies??? :P